EduPort 2021, 5(2):35-49 | DOI: 10.21062/edp.2022.001

VLIV VENKOVNÍ VÝUKY A POBYTU V PŘÍRODĚ NA FYZICKÉ A PSYCHICKÉ ZDRAVÍ ŽÁKŮ

Roman Kroufek, Karel Nepraš, Jan Musil, Ladislava Filipová
Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem

EFFECT OF OUTDOOR EDUCATION AND STAY IN NATURE ON PUPILS 'PHYSICAL AND PSYCHICAL HEALTH

Aims The aim of this review study is to present the current state of pedagogical and psychological research in the field of outdoor education of primary school pupils (ISCED 1 & ISCED 2). The study seeks answers to three basic questions: i) What are the common characteristics of published studies devoted to the benefits of outdoor education of primary school pupils? ii) What benefits of outdoor education are monitored in these studies? iii) What conclusions did these studies reach in the context of the observed benefits? Method To create a review study, a widely accepted Prisma 2020 model was used. The articles were searched in the Scopus and Web of Science databases. The selection of keywords used for the search respected the needs of the survey study and consisted of two areas that were combined. The first one defined the area of ​​interest (outdoor education, outdoor learning, fieldwork, nature connectedness, nature relatedness, connection to nature), the second defined the target group and the monitored qualities (primary education, primary school, elementary school, health, benefits, well-being). The number of keywords used reflects the terminological anxiety that prevails in the topic. The search was performed in the titles, abstracts and keywords of individual articles. All records from 2001 to 2020 were included, only reviewed articles were included in the search.Each selected database record was checked by two observers, in case of disagreement about the inclusion of the record in the survey study, the record was evaluated by a third observer. The criteria for including the text in the analysis were as follows: i)  the article has a research character, or it is an overview study on a given topic, ii) the target group is primarily primary school pupils, iii) the article deals with the benefits of outdoor education and staying in nature. A number of categories was monitored for each of the articles included in the review study (journal, year of publication, research design, country, age, type of school, activity holder, form of outdoor education, place of outdoor education, monitored benefits, results). The results were analyzed in both quantitative and qualitative ways. From 3268 database records, 67 articles were selected for detailed analysis. Results The analyzed studies were published in a total of 41 journals. During the observed twenty-year period, an intensive increase in the number of published studies can be observed only in the last five years. Most studies were from the United Kingdom, Denmark and Canada. Qualitative and quantitative design studies were evenly represented, mixed design was significantly rarer. More than half of the studies focused on the evaluation of outdoor education directly at the school, the rest focused on excursions and residential programs of ecocentres. Most outdoor education interventions lasted weeks to months, with only two studies looking at outdoor education for more than a year. The monitored benefits were divided into: i) the area of ​​emotions and attitudes (relationship to nature, mood, stress), ii) the area of ​​education (learning outcomes, motivation to learn, creativity, reading), iii) the area of ​​health and physical activity and iv) the area of social competencies (sense of community, teamwork, social interaction). In almost all cases, a positive shift was found due to outdoor teaching. Based on the results of the analyzed texts, outdoor education at primary school can be recommended as a suitable educational strategy, the use of which leads to a positive shift in the target areas of education.

Keywords: outdoor education, benefits, nature conectedness, nature relatedness, primary school

Zveřejněno: 1. prosinec 2021  Zobrazit citaci

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kroufek R, Nepraš K, Musil J, Filipová L. VLIV VENKOVNÍ VÝUKY A POBYTU V PŘÍRODĚ NA FYZICKÉ A PSYCHICKÉ ZDRAVÍ ŽÁKŮ. EduPort. 2021;5(2):35-49. doi: 10.21062/edp.2022.001.
Sdílet...
Stáhnout citaci
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Zobrazit celý článek

    Reference

    1. Arbuthnott, K. D., & Sutter, G. C. (2019). Songwriting for nature: increasing nature connection and well-being through musical creativity. Environmental Education Research, 25(9), 1300-1318. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2019.1608425 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    2. Ardoin, N. M., & Bowers, A. W. (2020). Early childhood environmental education: A systematic review of the research literature. Educational Research Review, 31, 100353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100353 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    3. Beck, A. M., & Meyers, N. M. (1996). Health Enhancement and Companion Animal Ownership. Annual Review of Public Health, 17(1), 247-257. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pu.17.050196.001335 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    4. Becker, C., Lauterbach, G., Spengler, S., Dettweiler, U., & Mess, F. (2017). Effects of Regular Classes in Outdoor Education Settings: A Systematic Review on Students' Learning, Social and Health Dimensions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(5), 485. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14050485 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    5. Bell, J. F., Wilson, J. S., & Liu, G. C. (2008). Neighborhood Greenness and 2 - Year Changes in Body Mass Index of Children and Youth. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(6), 547-553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.07.006 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    6. Bentsen, P., & Jensen, F. S. (2012). The nature ofudeskole: outdoor learning theory and practice in Danish schools. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 12(3), 199-219. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2012.699806 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    7. Bentsen, P., Mygind, E., & Randrup, T. B. (2009). Towards an understanding ofudeskole: education outside the classroom in a Danish context. Education 3-13, 37(1), 29-44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270802291780 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    8. Blair, D. (2009). The Child in the Garden: An Evaluative Review of the Benefits of School Gardening. The Journal of Environmental Education, 40(2), 15-38. https://doi.org/10.3200/joee.40.2.15-38 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    9. Bølling, M., Niclasen, J., Bentsen, P., & Nielsen, G. (2019). Association of Education Outside the Classroom and Pupils' Psychosocial Well-Being: Results From a School Year Implementation. Journal of School Health, 89(3), 210-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/josh.12730 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    10. Bølling, M., Otte, C. R., Elsborg, P., Nielsen, G., & Bentsen, P. (2018). The association between education outside the classroom and students' school motivation: Results from a one-school-year quasi-experiment. International Journal of Educational Research, 89, 22-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2018.03.004 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    11. Braun, T., & Dierkes, P. (2016). Connecting students to nature - how intensity of nature experience and student age influence the success of outdoor education programs. Environmental Education Research, 23(7), 937-949. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1214866 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    12. Capaldi, C. A., Dopko, R. L., & Zelenski, J. M. (2014). The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    13. Chawla, L. (2015). Benefits of Nature Contact for Children. Journal of Planning Literature, 30(4), 433-452. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412215595441 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    14. Chawla, L., Keena, K., Pevec, I., & Stanley, E. (2014). Green schoolyards as havens from stress and resources for resilience in childhood and adolescence. Health & Place, 28, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.03.001 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    15. Činčera, J., & Holec, J. (2016). Terénní výuka ve formálním vzdělávání. [Field teaching in formal education] Envigogika, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.14712/18023061.533 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    16. Coates, J. K., & Pimlott-Wilson, H. (2018). Learning while playing: Children's Forest School experiences in the UK. British Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3491 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    17. Dadvand, P., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Esnaola, M., Forns, J., Basagaña, X., Alvarez-Pedrerol, M., Rivas, I., López-Vicente, M., de Castro Pascual, M., Su, J., Jerrett, M., Querol, X., & Sunyer, J. (2015). Green spaces and cognitive development in primary schoolchildren. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(26), 7937-7942. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503402112 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    18. Daniš, P. (2018). Tajemství školy za školou: Proč učení venku v přírodě zlepšuje vzdělávací výsledky, motivaci a chování žáků. [School-to-school secrets: Why outdoor learning improves students' educational outcomes, motivation and behavior]. MŽP.
    19. di Fabio, A., & Kenny, M. E. (2018). Connectedness to nature, personality traits and empathy from a sustainability perspective. Current Psychology, 40(3), 1095-1106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-018-0031-4 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    20. Diette, G. B., Lechtzin, N., Haponik, E., Devrotes, A., & Rubin, H. R. (2003). Distraction Therapy With Nature Sights and Sounds Reduces Pain During Flexible Bronchoscopya. Chest, 123(3), 941-948. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.123.3.941 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    21. Dobber, M., Zwart, R., Tanis, M., & van Oers, B. (2017). Literature review: The role of the teacher in inquiry-based education. Educational Research Review, 22, 194-214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.09.002 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    22. Doležalová Křepelková, Š., Krajhanzl, J., & Kroufek, R. (2020). The Influence of Interaction with Nature in Childhood on Future Pro-Environmental Behavior. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(4), 536-550. https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/20.19.536 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    23. Faber Taylor, A., & Kuo, F. E. (2006). Is contact with nature important for healthy child development? State of the evidence. In C. Spencer & M. Blades (Eds.), Children and Their Environments (pp. 124-140). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511521232.009 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    24. Fägerstam, E., & Blom, J. (2013). Learning biology and mathematics outdoors: effects and attitudes in a Swedish high school context. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 13(1), 56-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2011.647432 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    25. Fägerstam, E., & Samuelsson, J. (2012). Learning arithmetic outdoors in junior high school - influence on performance and self-regulating skills. Education 3-13, 42(4), 419-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2012.713374 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    26. Fančovičová, J., & Prokop, P. (2011). Plants have a chance: outdoor educational programmes alter students' knowledge and attitudes towards plants. Environmental Education Research, 17(4), 537-551. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2010.545874 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    27. Fedorko, V. (2020). Outdoorová edukácia a pobyt vonku v materskej škole [Outdoor education and stay outside in kindergarten]. In Współczesne idee w edukacji przedszkolnej i wczesnoszkolnej (pp. 165-172). Instytut kultury regionalnej i badaň literackich im. Franciszka Karpinskiego.
    28. Gosling, E., & Williams, K. J. (2010). Connectedness to nature, place attachment and conservation behaviour: Testing connectedness theory among farmers. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 298-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.01.005 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    29. Hartig, T., Mang, M., & Evans, G. W. (1991). Restorative Effects of Natural Environment Experiences. Environment and Behavior, 23(1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916591231001 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    30. Harvey, D. J., Montgomery, L. N., Harvey, H., Hall, F., Gange, A. C., & Watling, D. (2020). Psychological benefits of a biodiversity-focussed outdoor learning program for primary school children. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 67, 101381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101381 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    31. Jeronen, E., Palmberg, I., & Yli-Panula, E. (2016). Teaching Methods in Biology Education and Sustainability Education Including Outdoor Education for Promoting Sustainability-A Literature Review. Education Sciences, 7(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7010001 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    32. Johnson, B., & Činčera, J. (2021). Relationships between outdoor environmental education program characteristics and children's environmental values and behaviors. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2021.2001756 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    33. Kals, E., Schumacher, D., & Montada, L. (1999). Emotional Affinity toward Nature as a Motivational Basis to Protect Nature. Environment and Behavior, 31(2), 178-202. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139169921972056 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    34. Kroufek, R., & Činčera, J. (2021). Metodický rámec pro environmentální gramotnost ve školách [Methodological framework for environmental literacy in schools]. MŽP. https://www.mzp.cz/C1257458002F0DC7/cz/environmentalni_vzdelavani_poradenstvi/$FILE/OFDN-Souhrnna_zprava_TITSMZP804-20210415.pdf
    35. Kroufek, R., Janovec, J., & ŠIkulová, R. (2020). Budoucí učitelé mateřských škol pohledem environmentální a technické edukace [Future kindergarten teachers in terms of environmental and technical education]. UJEP.
    36. Kříž, M., Mikulicová, H., Nešpor, J., Pitelková, P., & Vorlíček, J. (2019). Venkovní výuka. Metodika pro učení přírodou [Outdoor lessons. Methodology for learning by nature]. Lipka - školské zařízení pro environmentální vzdělávání Brno.
    37. Louv, R. (2008). Last Child in the Woods: Saving Our Children from Nature-Deficit Disorder (Updated and Expanded ed.). Algonquin Books.
    38. Lovasi, G. S., Quinn, J. W., Neckerman, K. M., Perzanowski, M. S., & Rundle, A. (2008). Children living in areas with more street trees have lower prevalence of asthma. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 62(7), 647-649. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2007.071894 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    39. Marchant, E., Todd, C., Cooksey, R., Dredge, S., Jones, H., Reynolds, D., Stratton, G., Dwyer, R., Lyons, R., & Brophy, S. (2019). Curriculum-based outdoor learning for children aged 9-11: A qualitative analysis of pupils' and teachers' views. PLOS ONE, 14(5), e0212242. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212242 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    40. Martyn, P., & Brymer, E. (2014). The relationship between nature relatedness and anxiety. Journal of Health Psychology, 21(7), 1436-1445. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105314555169 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    41. Mayer, F. S., Frantz, C. M., Bruehlman-Senecal, E., & Dolliver, K. (2008). Why Is Nature Beneficial? Environment and Behavior, 41(5), 607-643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508319745 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    42. Moffett, P. V. (2011). Outdoor mathematics trails: an evaluation of one training partnership. Education 3-13, 39(3), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004270903508462 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    43. Moore, E. O. (1981). A Prison Environment's Effect on Health Care Service Demands. Journal of Environmental Systems, 11(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.2190/km50-wh2k-k2d1-dm69 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    44. Morgan, I. G., Ohno-Matsui, K., & Saw, S. M. (2012). Myopia. The Lancet, 379(9827), 1739-1748. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(12)60272-4 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    45. MŠMT. (2021). Rámcový vzdělávací program pro základní vzdělávání [Framework educational program for basic education].
    46. Mullenbach, L. E., Andrejewski, R. G., & Mowen, A. J. (2018). Connecting children to nature through residential outdoor environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 25(3), 365-374. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1458215 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    47. Nadace Proměny. (2016). České děti venku. [Czech children outdoors.] https://www.nadace-promeny.cz/userfiles/files/2019/Ceske%20deti%20venku_Vyzkumna%20zprava.pdf
    48. Nepraš, K., & Šikulová, R. (2021). Odkud a kam směřuje venkovní výuka? Historie, současnost a trendy ve venkovní výuce v kontextu vzdělávacích teorií [Where and where does outdoor teaching go? History, present and trends in outdoor teaching in the context of educational theories]. Pedagogická Orientace, 31(2), 158-177. https://doi.org/10.5817/PedOr2021-2-158 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    49. Nisbet, E. K., & Zelenski, J. M. (2011). Underestimating Nearby Nature. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1101-1106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611418527 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    50. Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2010). Happiness is in our Nature: Exploring Nature Relatedness as a Contributor to Subjective Well-Being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(2), 303-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9197-7 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    51. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., . . . Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01626-4 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    52. Parsons, R., Tassinary, L. G., Ulrich, R. S., Hebl, M. R., & Grossman-Alexander, M. (1998). The View from the Road: Implications for Stress Recovery and Immunization. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 18(2), 113-140. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1998.0086 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    53. Pretty, J. (2004). How nature contributes to mental and physical health. Spirituality and Health International, 5(2), 68-78. https://doi.org/10.1002/shi.220 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    54. Reese, R. F., Lewis, T. F., Myers, J. E., Wahesh, E., & Iversen, R. (2014). Relationship Between Nature Relatedness and Holistic Wellness: An Exploratory Study. The Journal of Humanistic Counseling, 53(1), 63-79. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2161-1939.2014.00050.x Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    55. Romar, J. E., Enqvist, I., Kulmala, J., Kallio, J., & Tammelin, T. (2018). Physical activity and sedentary behaviour during outdoor learning and traditional indoor school days among Finnish primary school students. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 19(1), 28-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/14729679.2018.1488594 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    56. Sariçam, H., Şahin, S. H., & Soyucok, E. (2015). Doğayla ilişkili olma ile dpresyon, anksiyete ve stres arasindaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Internation Journal of Psychiatry and Psychological Researches, 4, 38. https://doi.org/10.17360/uhppd.2015414021 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    57. Seligman, M. E. P. (2012). Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-Being (1st ed.). Atria Books.
    58. Sever, I., Vranic, M., Bosnjak, K., Cacic, I., Protulipac, M., & Klepac, M. (2017). Teacher and Pupil Evaluation of Ourdoor Education in Zagreb's Elementary Schools. Metodicki Ogledi - Metodical Review, 24(1), 95-108. Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    59. Sop Shin, W. (2007). The influence of forest view through a window on job satisfaction and job stress. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 22(3), 248-253. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580701262733 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    60. Stockman, J. (2010). Outdoor Activity Reduces the Prevalence of Myopia in Children. Yearbook of Pediatrics, 2010, 505-507. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0084-3954(09)79489-8 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    61. Svobodová, H., Durna, R., Mísařová, D., & Hofmann, E. (2019). Komparace formálního ukotvení terénní výuky ve školních vzdělávacích programech a její pojetí v modelových základních školách [Comparison of formal anchoring of field teaching in school educational programs and its conception in model primary schools]. ORBIS SCHOLAE, 13(2), 95-116. https://doi.org/10.14712/23363177.2019.25 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    62. Svobodová, H., Mísařová, D., Durna, R., Češková, T., & Hofmann, E. (2019b). Koncepce terénní výuky pro základní školy. Na příkladu námětů pro krátkodobou a střednědobou terénní výuku vlastivědného a zeměpisného učiva. [Concept of field teaching for primary schools. On the example of ideas for short-term and medium-term field teaching of homeland studies and geographical curriculum]. Masarykova univerzita. https://doi.org/10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-9246-2019 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    63. Svobodová, H., Mísařová, D., Durna, R., & Hofmann, E. (2018). The Evaluation of Potential Contributions of Outdoor Education Teacher's Versus Pupil's Point of View. In H. Svobodová (Ed.), Useful Geography: Transfer from Research to Practice (pp. 82-90). Masaryk University.
    64. Ucimesevenku.cz (2019, 3. prosince). Cesta ven, aneb kontinuum pro rozvoj učení venku [The way out, or a continuum for the development of learning outside]. https://ucimesevenku.cz
    65. Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201-230. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80184-7 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    66. Vácha, Z. (2015). Didaktické využití školních zahrad v České republice na primárním stupni základních škol [Didactic use of school gardens in the Czech Republic at the primary level of primary schools]. Scientia in Educatione, 6(1), 80-90. https://doi.org/10.14712/18047106.143 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    67. Van den Bogerd, N., Coosje Dijkstra, S., Koole, S. L., Seidell, J. C., de Vries, R., & Maas, J. (2020). Nature in the indoor and outdoor study environment and secondary and tertiary education students' well-being, academic outcomes, and possible mediating pathways: A systematic review with recommendations for science and practice. Health & Place, 66, 102403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102403 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    68. Waite, S., Goodenough, A., Norris, V., & Puttick, N. (2016). From little acorns.: environmental action as a source of well-being for schoolchildren. Pastoral Care in Education, 34(1), 43-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2015.1119879 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    69. Wells, N. M., & Evans, G. W. (2003). Nearby Nature. Environment and Behavior, 35(3), 311-330. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916503035003001 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    70. White, M. P., Alcock, I., Grellier, J., Wheeler, B. W., Hartig, T., Warber, S. L., Bone, A., Depledge, M. H., & Fleming, L. E. (2019). Spending at least 120 minutes a week in nature is associated with good health and wellbeing. Scientific Reports, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-44097-3 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    71. WHO. (2020). Considerations for school-related public health measures in the context of COVID-19.
    72. Windhorst, E., & Williams, A. (2015). Growing Up, Naturally: The Mental Health Legacy of Early Nature Affiliation. Ecopsychology, 7(3), 115-125. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2015.0040 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...
    73. Zelenski, J. M., Dopko, R. L., & Capaldi, C. A. (2015). Cooperation is in our nature: Nature exposure may promote cooperative and environmentally sustainable behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 24-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.01.005 Přejít k původnímu zdroji...

    Tento článek je publikován v režimu tzv. otevřeného přístupu k vědeckým informacím (Open Access), který je distribuován pod licencí Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), která umožňuje nekomerční distribuci, reprodukci a změny, pokud je původní dílo řádně ocitováno. Není povolena distribuce, reprodukce nebo změna, která není v souladu s podmínkami této licence.


    Zpět na obsah