EduPort 2023, 7(2):37-47 | DOI: 10.21062/edp.2023.008
EDUCATION FOR A SUSTAINABLE FUTURE: TEACHING UNIVERSITY STUDENTS THROUGH A DEVELOPMENTAL CONTINUUM OF RESPONSIBLE BEHAVIOUR
- Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně v Ústí nad Labem (CZECH REPUBLIC)
Aims The aim of this study is to present the results of an evaluation of university courses that have been innovated using the Developmental Continuum of Responsible Behaviour towards Nature and People. This continuum has been adopted as a framework for course modifications by the Lipka Eco-Centre staff, who are also working at several Czech universities. The innovations emphasized a holistic approach, where not only students' knowledge but also their attitudes and competences were increased. The evaluation sought to answer the following two questions: 1. In what ways did the observed variables (relationship to place, teacher self-efficacy, attitudes towards climate change, climate hope, environmental attitudes, locus of control, environmental problems, research skills) change in university students after they completed a course innovated according to the developmental continuum of responsible behaviour? 2. How do the selected variables (relationship to place, teacher self-efficacy, attitudes toward climate change, climate hope, environmental attitudes, locus of control) correlate with each other? Method The research design was quantitative, data for the evaluation of individual innovations were collected before the start of the course and after the end of the course, in the examination period belonging to the respective semester. The data collection took place in the winter and summer semesters of the academic year 2022/2023. For data collection, students of the respective course were always approached and identified by a unique code within the questionnaire. Only students who were able to pair pretest and posttests were included in the analyses (N = 123, ZS = 39, LS = 84). Because different combinations of research instrument segments were applied to different courses, the number of respondents varied across analyses. The research tool as a whole consisted of five dimensions (Place attachement; Empowerment; Attitudes and values; Environmental issues; Inquiry based education). Instructors then selected only those segments of the research tool that were relevant to their course. For most instruments, respondents commented on each item on a five-point Likert scale (strongly agree - partially agree - can't decide - partially disagree - strongly disagree). The exceptions are environmental issues and research, where open-ended questions were asked. Results The most significant shift was observed in the variable teacher self-efficacy, which measured teacher students' beliefs about their future ability to implement various environmental education and sustainable education strategies. Even the entry values in the pretest were high. Even so, there was a significant increase after completing the course, which in the case of this variable can be explained both by the influence of experienced environmental education instructors who use a range of practice-oriented approaches and examples in their work, and by the competency focus of the developmental continuum used for course innovation. There was also a significant increase in the second variable that falls under the empowerment dimension, the Locus of Control variable, which represents the student's belief in their ability to engage in actions to benefit the environment. This is a key variable in relation to an individual's pro-environmental behaviour. As such, it is central to the developmental continuum of responsible action, and thus to the adaptations of university courses implemented. An individual's environmental attitudes are also a significant predictor of responsible pro-environmental behaviour. While appreciation of nature, a general expression of an individual's relationship with nature, remained without significant change (input values close to the maximum did not even allow for a significant change), there was a positive shift in the case of attitudes towards conservation. Again, its interpretation can be based on a combination of the personality of the lecturer and the changes that occurred in the course content through the implementation of a continuum that strongly resonates nature conservation as one of the general objectives of environmental education. Hopes associated with the climate crisis have also increased significantly. The high correlation between those variables commented on in the previous paragraphs of the discussion is striking. Thus, it is Locus of Control, teacher self-efficacy and attitudes towards conservation that correlate most strongly with each other. Thus, the variables most strongly influencing the responsible behaviour towards which the competence described by the developmental continuum is directed. In particular, the high correlation between attitudes towards conservation and Locus of Control, which tends to moderate the relationship between attitudes and behaviour, is significant. The interconnectedness of these three variables was strengthened after the courses, where the measured correlations did not decrease in any case. This can, in fact, be said of almost all correlations found.
Keywords: education for sustainable future, evaluation, university education, environmental education
Published: September 1, 2023 Show citation
References
- Alp, E., Ertepinar, H., Tekkaya, C., & Yilmaz, A. (2008). A survey on Turkish elementary school students' environmental friendly behaviours and associated variables. Environmental Education Research, 14(2), 129-143. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802051747
Go to original source...
- Azar, A. (2010). In-service and pre-service secondary science teachers` self-efficacy beliefs about science teaching. Educational Research and Reviews, 5(4), 172-185. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR09.243
Go to original source...
- Bogner, F. (2018). Environmental Values (2-MEV) and Appreciation of Nature. Sustainability, 10(2), 350. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020350
Go to original source...
- Christensen, R., & Knezek, G. (2015). The Climate Change Attitude Survey: Measuring Middle School Student Beliefs and Intentions to Enact Positive Environmental Change. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 10(5), 773-788.
- Činčera, J., Jančaříková, K., Kindlmannová, J., Šimonová, P., & Volfová, A. (2011). Doporučené očekávané výstupy - Environmentální výchova v základním vzdělávání. VÚP.
Go to original source...
- Cincera, J., Johnson, B., & Kovacikova, S. (2015). Evaluation of a Place-Based Environmental Education Program: From There to Here. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2015.1067580.
Go to original source...
- Činčera, J., & Kroufek, R. (2021). Metodika hodnocení environmentální gramotnosti žáků. Praha: MŽP.
- Fielding, K. S., & Head, B. W. (2012). Determinants of young Australians' environmental actions: the role of responsibility attributions, locus of control, knowledge and attitudes. Environmental Education Research, 18(2), 171-186. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2011.592936
Go to original source...
- Filho, W. L., Shiel, C., & Paço, A. D. (2015). Integrative approaches to environmental sustainability at universities: An overview of challenges and priorities. Journal of Integrative Environmental Sciences, 12(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1943815X.2014.988273
Go to original source...
- Helmers, E. and Ilchmann, F. (2019). Sustainability Subjects in University Education - Development of a Comprehensive Indicator System and Quantitative Analysis of Degree Programs at German Universities. European Journal of Sustainable Development Research, 3(4), em0092. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejosdr/5771
Go to original source...
- Hernández-Diaz, P. M., Polanco, J. A., Escobar-Sierra, M., & Filho, W. L. (2021). Holistic integration of sustainability at universities: Evidences from Colombia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127145
Go to original source...
- Jonsson, A. K. E., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Exploring the Relationship Between Values and Pro-Environmental Behaviour: The Influence of Locus of Control. Environmental Values, 23(3). 297-314. https://doi.org/10.3197/096327114X139479001817
Go to original source...
- Kioupi, V., & Voulvoulis, N. (2020), Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Assessing the Contribution of Higher Education Programmes. Sustainability, 12, 6701. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176701
Go to original source...
- Koehn, P. H., & Uitto, J. I. (2013). Evaluating sustainability education: lessons from international development experience. Higher Education, 67, 621-635. http://doi.org/ 10.1007/S10734-013-9669-X
Go to original source...
- Kroufek, R. & Činčera, J. (2021). Metodický rámec pro environmentální gramotnost ve školách. Souhrnná výzkumná zpráva, MŽP.
- Li, C. & Monroe, M. C. (2017). Development and Validation of the Climate Change Hope Scale for High School Students. Environment and Behavior, 50(4). https://doi.org/10.1177/001391651770
Go to original source...
- Lozano, R., Ceulemans, K., Alonso-Almeida, M., Huisingh, D., Lozano, F. J., Waas, T., Lambrechts, W., Lukman, R., & Hugé, J. (2019). A review of commitment and implementation of stustainable development in higher education: results from a worldwide survey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.09.048
Go to original source...
- McMillin, J., & Dyball, R. (2009). Developing a Whole-of-University Approach to Educating for Sustainability. Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 3(55), 55-64. https://doi.org/10.1177/097340820900300113
Go to original source...
- Mikulicová, H., Endrštová, V., Hrubanová, K., Kroufek, R., Kulich, J., Novotná, M., Šimonová, P., & Vorlíček, J. (2019). Vývojové kontinuum. Kompetence k odpovědnému jednání k přírodě a k lidem. Lipka. Dostupné z: https://www.lipka.cz/soubory/vyvojove_kontinuum_final--f11643.pdf
- Munoz-Rodríguez, J. M., Sánchez-Carracedo, F., Barrón-Ruiz, Á., & Serrate-González, S. (2020). Are We Training in Sustainability in Higher Education? Case Study: Education Degrees at the University of Salamanca. Sustainability, 12(11), 4421, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114421
Go to original source...
- Pendergast, D., Garvis, S., & Keogh, J. (2011). Pre-Service Student-Teacher Self-efficacy Beliefs: An Insight Into the Making of Teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(12), 46-58. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n12.6
Go to original source...
- Rowe, D. (2007). Education for Sustainable Future. Science, 317(5836), 323-324. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1143552
Go to original source...
- Sammalisto, K., Sundstöm, A., & Holm, T. (2015). Implementation of sustainability in universities as perceived by faculty and staff - a model from Swedish university. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 45-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.10.015
Go to original source...
- Solís-Espallargas, C., & Valderrama-Hernández, R. (2015). La educación para la sostenibilidad en la formación de profesorado. ¿Qué estamos haciendo? Foro de Educación, 13(19), 165-192. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14516/fde.2015.013.019.008
Go to original source...
- Topuniversities.com (2023). QS World University Rankings: Sustainablity 2024. Dostupné z: https://www.topuniversities.com/sustainability-rankings
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.